On Herzberg's "Community Service and Self Teaching"
Ever since we first discussed Hairston's piece in which she talks about the importance of keeping politics and social issues out of the class room, I've felt compelled to bring more social issues into the classroom, and I've been looking for ways to practically do that. While I've come up with some ideas of my own for shifting my course next semester to help my students think about writing in relation to the world, I was glad to read about Herzberg's experience of practically confronting social issues in the classroom with his students.
Admittedly, the project Herzberg takes on with his students--studying illiteracy, teaching them tutoring skills, and beginning a tutoring program with them--sounds overwhelming for me as a teacher with little experience. However, I can still appreciate the overarching ideas Herzberg is passing on in sharing his experience, and I can keep in mind some of his learned experiences when working to draw my class out in discussion and critical thinking on social issues.
I know that when I was a freshman in college, as many of our composition students are, I did not even begin to understand systematic oppression. In many ways, I still only have limited knowledge on how society is designed to discriminate against particular groups of people, because I belong to several privileged groups. However, I was impressed that Herzberg had a close enough understanding of the thought process his students were going through to help them make the jump from fixating on individualism and meritocracy to understand that the very systems around which our lives are based and set up to encourage those with opportunity and to assume that when someone doesn't have advantages in life, it's through a fault of their own.
Of their time early on in the program, Herzberg writes, "The students tended to see their learners, quite naturally, as individuals with personal problems--alcoholism and drugs, mental breakdown, family disintegration, or some nameless inability to concentrate and cope." I like Herzberg's classroom approach in that he doesn't blame students for their naive understandings of privilege, but instead, he meets them where they're at, in their own level of understanding, while also challenging his students and making them uncomfortable with what they've previously known to be true.
When I compare the ending place of Herzberg's students to their starting place, I'm can't help but be impressed. He writes, "What the students' final papers show, then, is a sense of life as a communal project, an understanding of the way that social institutions affect our lives, and a sense that our responsibility for social justice includes but also carries beyond personal acts of charity." In my eyes, you have to have an in-depth understanding of your students and the knowledge and understanding they bring to the table to have a semester turn such successful results.
However, what I've pulled from this article is not only the strides that Herzberg was able to make, but the way that he has helped me continue to reframe my thinking of social issues with composition. Again, as a new teacher, I want to make those connections--I want to talk to my students about important issues in the classroom and to show them that writing is not separate from real life in these ways--but I struggle to readily see those connections on my own, much less make them for my students. Herzberg writes, "These efforts belong in the composition classroom because of the rhetorical as well as the practical nature of citizenship and social transformation." What I take from that is while it's important to talk about social issues in the classroom for the sake of thinking about rhetorical situation, these issues matter on their own, even aside from rhetorical connections. As teachers (especially as teachers in the humanities), we do have a responsibility to inform and engage our students when it comes to what's going on in the world. I don't think that means there's a black-and-white instruction book on how to do this, or that it has to look the same from one teacher to the next, but it does mean that we have the opportunity to help our students think bigger, beyond the frame of just passing a required composition course.
Admittedly, the project Herzberg takes on with his students--studying illiteracy, teaching them tutoring skills, and beginning a tutoring program with them--sounds overwhelming for me as a teacher with little experience. However, I can still appreciate the overarching ideas Herzberg is passing on in sharing his experience, and I can keep in mind some of his learned experiences when working to draw my class out in discussion and critical thinking on social issues.
I know that when I was a freshman in college, as many of our composition students are, I did not even begin to understand systematic oppression. In many ways, I still only have limited knowledge on how society is designed to discriminate against particular groups of people, because I belong to several privileged groups. However, I was impressed that Herzberg had a close enough understanding of the thought process his students were going through to help them make the jump from fixating on individualism and meritocracy to understand that the very systems around which our lives are based and set up to encourage those with opportunity and to assume that when someone doesn't have advantages in life, it's through a fault of their own.
Of their time early on in the program, Herzberg writes, "The students tended to see their learners, quite naturally, as individuals with personal problems--alcoholism and drugs, mental breakdown, family disintegration, or some nameless inability to concentrate and cope." I like Herzberg's classroom approach in that he doesn't blame students for their naive understandings of privilege, but instead, he meets them where they're at, in their own level of understanding, while also challenging his students and making them uncomfortable with what they've previously known to be true.
When I compare the ending place of Herzberg's students to their starting place, I'm can't help but be impressed. He writes, "What the students' final papers show, then, is a sense of life as a communal project, an understanding of the way that social institutions affect our lives, and a sense that our responsibility for social justice includes but also carries beyond personal acts of charity." In my eyes, you have to have an in-depth understanding of your students and the knowledge and understanding they bring to the table to have a semester turn such successful results.
However, what I've pulled from this article is not only the strides that Herzberg was able to make, but the way that he has helped me continue to reframe my thinking of social issues with composition. Again, as a new teacher, I want to make those connections--I want to talk to my students about important issues in the classroom and to show them that writing is not separate from real life in these ways--but I struggle to readily see those connections on my own, much less make them for my students. Herzberg writes, "These efforts belong in the composition classroom because of the rhetorical as well as the practical nature of citizenship and social transformation." What I take from that is while it's important to talk about social issues in the classroom for the sake of thinking about rhetorical situation, these issues matter on their own, even aside from rhetorical connections. As teachers (especially as teachers in the humanities), we do have a responsibility to inform and engage our students when it comes to what's going on in the world. I don't think that means there's a black-and-white instruction book on how to do this, or that it has to look the same from one teacher to the next, but it does mean that we have the opportunity to help our students think bigger, beyond the frame of just passing a required composition course.
the
students'
final
papers
show,
then,
is
a
sense
of
life
as
a
communal
project,
an
understanding
of
the
way
that
social
institutions
affect
our
lives,
and
a
sense
that
our
responsibility
for
social
justice
includes
but
also
carries
beyond
personal
acts
of
charity
the
students'
final
papers
show,
then,
is
a
sense
of
life
as
a
communal
project,
an
understanding
of
the
way
that
social
institutions
affect
our
lives,
and
a
sense
that
our
responsibility
for
social
justice
includes
but
also
carries
beyond
personal
acts
of
charity
I really appreciate the idea of bringing community service into the classroom. I attended Catholic school growing up and this type of thing was so built into the curriculum, I assumed that it was normal and that everyone volunteered their time/money in the service of others. Even though there were times I griped about it, I had no idea how much a part of my identity it had become until I went to a public college where it was not expected and, in fact, I had to seek out my own ways to “give back.” I feel lucky that this was instilled in me early on and I love the idea of bringing it into the writing classroom. I know this is a huge cliché, but I really believe that giving back is valuable for both parties involved. I was forever changed and humbled by some of the projects I have been involved in and, as you insinuated, it helps people to understand one another in a way that might not have otherwise happened. Each week, I see a bigger connection to the writing classroom and the potential for good citizenship in the community. Thanks for your thoughts. -Mary
ReplyDeleteMary,
DeleteIt's unfortunate that that isn't the norm everywhere. The thing I loved was that Herzberg was able to move this activity beyond simple helping people with individual problems to helping his students come to an understanding that the problem lies within our systems, and while they should still help, they should understand how the systems in our society have set people up to fail and keep failing.
You're so right--I think community service can do wonders in a writing class room. Admittedly, organizing a project like the one Herzberg has created is intimidating to me, and I struggle to think how I would fit something like that into our comp classes. But at the very least, it's certainly food for thought.
Shelbi
Hi Shelbi,
ReplyDeleteI think bringing community service into the classroom can work as a great form of learning if done correctly. In my undergrad, I had one professor in particular who would incorporate service-learning into every single class she taught, regardless of the subject matter. At the time, it was difficult to make the connects between those projects and the learning that I was getting from them, but looking back they were valuable experiences. I think making the connect of the learning project to your class and overall social issue is super important in an effort to give the project meaning and context for your students.
Abbie
Hi Shelbi,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading this work and so did reading your blog. Incorporating community service into the classroom surely can be a great way of learning. As students don't take degrees only from a university but take a lot of other things with them when they graduated which later helps them to trade in with the real world. However, I believe, the university is also a place that forms the structure of a human being (from an ethical perspective including values, norms, etc)on the foundation made by their family and earlier schools. So, in one sense, we can say, introducing community service as a form of learning in the classroom will also grow the potential of a good citizen among students. However, if I keep apart the social service thing and talk about the writing class, even then it has good interrelation. Writing is not something different from the real world. Moreover, we got some readings before where it was emphasized that students write well when they write about their familiar world thus we generally start the assignments with a personal narrative essay.
So, when they will incorporate their community service experiences in academia by presenting their experiences in words, for sure they will do better. However, we always encourage them that they should choose something that they are interested in, which means generally we can explore more in our areas of interest and it makes our writing easy and productive too.
I hope practicing this in the classroom may bring good results. However, I'm also worried about the lack of experience in us. Probably, being a novice, we can't implement the idea up to the mark, but we can try to incorporate this idea at least to some extent. As a facilitator, this is also our responsibility to introduce them to the real world.
Shelbi,
ReplyDeleteI think whenever you attempt anything like this, it’s tricky. You’re introducing an element that’s new, you don’t have experience with, and a lot of factors beyond your control as to how it will pan out (at least, I would feel nervous about having less control).
Especially if you’re introducing community service, I’d think the first step would be to see if there are existing service programs in place you could tap into—that are already set up to meet existing needs, and you wouldn’t have to take that step of creating your own if you didn’t feel ready yet. It might be harder to connect it to class material/work, but if you’re already setting up a class with a theme relating to community/social ideas, it could be manageable. If you’re serving within the university setting it might be easier to come across or introduce these types of programs.
It just seems like a lot to handle on top of still being new to teaching overall, although I think it’s a wonderful thing and admire anyone with the bravery to attempt it.
-Jessie
Hey Shelbi
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in the fact that I too find this kind of teaching to be extremely tricky. I too sometimes struggle to see the ways that I can not only include service learning, but also broach some of those really difficult global and social conversations that can really make classes transformative. I wish there was a black-and-white instructive manual on how to do this, but I think by attempting it all all you are working in a way that is transformative. Modelling discomfort to students is something i don't think people do often or enough, but I think that resiliency and bravery are things that would pair well with this idea of teaching about social issues and service learning.
-Sarah
Sarah,
DeleteYou make a really good point. I think it's my (and maybe many of our) tendency to want to appear to students as though whatever we're doing, I've got it figured out. I think this is for my own sense of confidence, but for theirs too. I want my students to have confidence in me to lead and teach them.
But I like the idea of being willing to be more uncomfortable with my students. We often ask students to be uncomfortable in the classroom by trying new assignments or applying new concepts, and we're always the ones with the answers. We rarely model that feeling of discomfort or learning alongside them.
I liked that the author mentioned that her students like when she freewrites alongside them. I had a professor who did this in undergrad, and it definitely modeled for me the use of this exercise--she was a real life writer and writing professor who valued the practice of spending time writing regularly. And it encouraged me to keep going. I think this is one way to model that writing is a process for everyone, and that we can learn and grow alongside one another.
Shelby,
ReplyDeleteI too, was intrigued by Herzberg’s demonstration of service learning. I think we’re at the point where I have annoyingly pronounced my “civic education” agenda in 605…and yet, I came out of Herzberg’s article with reservations. Herzberg does not intend for the service component to be forefront. He states it very clearly that the service component puts a “human face to the education students are receiving.” Though at first read I did not find myself in contention with him—I mean, come on, the dude is tackling a LOT of complex systems in a FRESHMAN-LEVEL composition course. I wanted to give him the credit he deserves—It is after a couple reads that I began questioning, if tutoring is not the experience, but rather the “supplemental activity,” does this not feel as though those tutees who chose to participate were cheated?
I think if we are to truly engage with critical pedagogy, we must consider the implications of pushing the service component to the background. Taking this demonstration from “some students mentioning the service component in their final course papers” to all students recognizing how their volunteerism informed their grasp of the content knowledge. And not only this, but if we are to change both consciousness and situation (as Freire suggests to counter “The Banking Concept of Education), then shouldn’t students be creating artifacts that are functional instead of futile? Not that a paper is completely worthless; it assists students in carefully articulating complex content and theoretical frameworks. But what if Herzberg’s students were to create an artifact that actually incited social and/or societal change? This could move us one step closer to that Freire idea of resituating positionality towards meeting the needs and immediacy of the situation at the shelter.
I was thinking instead of a “final paper,” students could use the pedagogical approaches learned from Perspectives on Literacy meshed with their shelter experience to create a template for shelters advertising their service… Create instructional reading guides for tutees to take home…Provide literacy development training for those who are employed and/or volunteer at the shelter. I think there are a lot of options here! This would encourage students to use their knowledge in a more strategic/procedural way. This could move this class from being a “socially and culturally conscious class” to a “socially and culturally conscious class capable of socio-cultural change.
Great post! I had a lot of fun with this reading in particular!
-Kelli